On 10:27 Wed 22 Aug , Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 00:18 Wed 22 Aug , Olivier Crête wrote:
> >> Can't we just install xcb alongside regular Xlib ? If we can't, I would
> >> favor making xcb the default. Its significantly better than the old
> >> Xlib.
> >
> > You cou
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 00:18 Wed 22 Aug , Olivier Crête wrote:
>> Can't we just install xcb alongside regular Xlib ? If we can't, I would
>> favor making xcb the default. Its significantly better than the old
>> Xlib.
>
> You could try it, but you might get inconsistent results when runni
On 00:18 Wed 22 Aug , Olivier Crête wrote:
> Can't we just install xcb alongside regular Xlib ? If we can't, I would
> favor making xcb the default. Its significantly better than the old
> Xlib.
You could try it, but you might get inconsistent results when running a
non-XCB Xlib with apps that
On Wed, 2007-22-08 at 05:58 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> I'd like to open the question just the other way round: Wh
On 05:58 Wed 22 Aug , Hanno Böck wrote:
> With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make xcb
Hi,
With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make xcb
default?
And: How should I handle that? We d
