Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of GPG-verified trees

2016-05-05 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:14:22AM +0200, M.B. wrote: > Good evening folks, > > in the past I witnessed bits and pieces of attempts to increase the > infrastructure userside, but, unless I'm mistaken, there's still room > for improvement. > > Since a couple of years we have the webrsync-gpg FEATU

[gentoo-dev] Status of GPG-verified trees

2016-05-05 Thread M.B.
Good evening folks, in the past I witnessed bits and pieces of attempts to increase the infrastructure userside, but, unless I'm mistaken, there's still room for improvement. Since a couple of years we have the webrsync-gpg FEATURE, which enables automatic verification of the portage tree, when u