Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/19/2013 07:21 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: >> ... if it is used in the ebuild? >> >> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> > > Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Christoph Junghans
2013/2/19 Brian Dolbec : > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: >> ... if it is used in the ebuild? >> >> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> > > Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem > running a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: > ... if it is used in the ebuild? > > It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? > > Cheers, > Thomas > Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem running a catalyst build because portage-util

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > ... if it is used in the ebuild? > > It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? No. sed is required by POSIX, so it shall always be there. Additionally, it's provided by PMS too. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signatu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
Hi thomas, @all: Thanks for bring up this for discussion.. I think 'embedded' profile have only one sys-apps/busybox as system package, but seems this profile haven't updated for long time, and may become obsolete.. Dennis On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > ... if it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > ... if it is used in the ebuild? > > It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? > > Cheers, > Thomas > Gnu sed version 4 is guaranteed by pms [1] [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12500011.3.1 signatur

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Markos Chandras
On 19 February 2013 13:10, Thomas Kahle wrote: > ... if it is used in the ebuild? > > It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? > > Cheers, > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Kahle > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ No you should not. It is a system package for every arch because it's listed

[gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Kahle
... if it is used in the ebuild? It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature