Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-26 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:16:10AM +0100, Grobian wrote: > Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep > GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it > needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS > ebuilds, so that eas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-19 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 11:05:15PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Are they all in package.mask? No, not all of them - but Halcy0n has agreed to take a look at it. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd pgpjpq5MVfmAS.pgp Descri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-19 Thread Grobian
Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS ebuilds, so that eases things a bit. Seems many of the packages can use an upgrade,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Fabian Borschel
Hi Devs, On 2006-03-18 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However, since the GNUStep herd is void, no one has stepped up to fix those ebuilds - meaning we have a bunch of useless, non-functional, live CVS ebuilds laying around in portage, see the list below. Did

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and | mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds, have now been updated for this | change. Are they all in package.mask? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Deve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: > A lot of ebuilds probably fall under this category, and we should figure > out how we want to handle all of them. I say mask the GNUStep stuff for a > month or two, put something on staffing-needs saying we need someone to > maintain t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Mark Loeser
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to > pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes. > > Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and > mostly all, except the GNUStep ebu

[gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

2006-03-18 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
In December last year Savannah changed their CVS from anonymous SSH to pserver, causing quite a few of our live CVS ebuilds to need changes. Back then, I opened bug #115327 listing the offending ebuilds and mostly all, except the GNUStep ebuilds, have now been updated for this change. However, si