On Friday 28 September 2007 01:10:48 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
> > considered? Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they
> > offer the same free type of certificate to open source projects just like
> > cacert,
* Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/09/27 15:11 -0700]:
> Go and read ALL of this bug:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108944
> Pylon and myself, as folk in favour of CA-Cert tried to get the ball
> rolling to get Organization-level certs from CACert. It seems to have
> long blocked
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:47:36PM -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> Is there a reason that my Godaddy suggestion in the bug isn't being
> considered?
> Regardless of what you may think of them as a company, they offer the same
> free type
> of certificate to open source projects just like cacert, an
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
>> Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
>> security policy.
> Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
> on your definition of 'secure'.
> - Is the traffic encrypte
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote:
> Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
> security policy.
Whether or not self-signed certs are secure or insecure depends entirely
on your definition of 'secure'.
- Is the traffic encrypted betwee
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Hanno Böck wrote:
>> I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be
>> a big improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and
>> more other pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that
>> people will already have the cacert-roo
Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Andrew Gaffney:
> How does a CAcert certificate help? Their own certificate for
> https://www.cacert.org/ can't be verified by Firefox 2.0.0.7, which tells
> me that their CA isn't trusted by default.
They're workin on that, goal is to include in ff. But any
Hanno Böck wrote:
I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
How does a C
Hanno Böck kirjoitti:
>
> I think compared to self-signed, having cacert-certificates would be a big
> improvement. Many other free software projects (and more and more other
> pages) use cacert, so it becomes more and more likely that people will
> already have the cacert-root-cert installed.
Hi,
Everytime I'm sending out a mail with my gentoo.org-address, I get
this "certificate may be unsecure" message. Gentoo mailserver (and forums,
bugzilla and probably many more) use self-signed ssl-certificates.
Well, I hope I don't have to tell that self-signed certs are not really good
secu
10 matches
Mail list logo
