Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 08:02:03 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > > >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be > >> indented? Tabs or n spaces? > > > > There's no rule, but w

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 26/06/2011 в 17:20 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: > I never understood the reason after keeping deps not sorted alphabetically > where order doesn't matter - it's like someone purposely made ebuild harder > to > read - it's counter productive. Like with perl modules with well written con

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:51:53 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 27 June 2011 03:20, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: >> I personally prefer tabs, but I also like using EAPI="", >> sorting everything alphabetically and even use the following depend blocks: > >> *DEPEND=" >>       !>       !Y >>       >>       >>       ... >>       >>       a? ( ) >>       b? ( )

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Dale
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 201

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > Another qu

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Saturday 25 of June 2011 22:32:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> *DEPEND=" >>       !>       !Y >>       >>       >>       ... >>       >>       a? ( ) >>       b? ( ) >>       c? ( >>               >>               >>    

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Saturday 25 of June 2011 22:32:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 25-06-2011 14:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be > >> indented? Tabs or n spaces? > > > > There's no rul

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25-06-2011 14:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be >> indented? Tabs or n spaces? >> > > There's no rule, but we should follow the sam

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: >>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be >>> indented? Tabs or n spaces? >> >> There's no rule, but we s

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be >> indented? Tabs or n spaces? > > There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — > indentation should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be > indented? Tabs or n spaces? > There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in editors (no expans

[gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread justin
Hi all, so I solved my signing question. With a 1024 DSA key you need to add enable-dsa2 personal-digest-preferences SHA256 to your gpg.conf. Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP