On 11/06/2015 08:34 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 7 November 2015 at 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> These days, if I'm careful to revbump when necessary AND limit my
>> commits to one logical change, can I wind up going from (say) -r1 all
>> the way to -r4 before pushing my changes.
>
> Persona
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 02:34:22 +1300
Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 7 November 2015 at 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > These days, if I'm careful to revbump when necessary AND limit my
> > commits to one logical change, can I wind up going from (say) -r1
> > all the way to -r4 before pushing my changes
On 7 November 2015 at 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> These days, if I'm careful to revbump when necessary AND limit my
> commits to one logical change, can I wind up going from (say) -r1 all
> the way to -r4 before pushing my changes.
Personally I don't think that's necessary. The "-r bump on d
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> after making those three revbumps, what I see is that I added and
> removed the entire ebuild three times. True, but useless.
Try git show/log -M
//Peter
These days, if I'm careful to revbump when necessary AND limit my
commits to one logical change, can I wind up going from (say) -r1 all
the way to -r4 before pushing my changes.
That looks a little weird to users, but whatever, I can explain it. The
real annoyance is that I don't get decent diffs
