[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-16 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:05:19 -0500 as excerpted: > there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. > > I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very > small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my > origi

[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:43:27 +0200 as excerpted: > 1) It's a couple of years old now. :) > 2) Having used it all that time on some systems, I don't see that many >superficial changes, or for that matter, deviations from the old init >system. I would rather think basel

[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:49:36 -0500 as excerpted: > Openrc is not just a gentoo init system; I know that at least Alpine > Linux [1] also uses it. > > William > > [1] http://www.alpinelinux.org Thanks for the specific mention. I've seen "non-gentoo users" mentioned a coupl

[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-12 Thread Duncan
Patrick Lauer posted on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:08:32 +0200 as excerpted: > On 04/12/11 16:56, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. >> > Thanks to all who kept chiseling away at this issue >From a user who has been following developments since the baselayout