On Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:00:08 PM Dominique Michel wrote:
> Another fact remain: theology is about religion when genealogy
> is about sciences.
Theology *is* a science.
Anyway, gramps is no longer part of the theology herd. Can we drop this
now?
Best regards, Wulf
pgpvhWvMjUbRS.pgp
Desc
Le Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:27:47 + (UTC),
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Dominique Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
> 18:32:50 +0200:
>
> > I disagree. When searching for a software to do a given job and when I
> > have no idea o
Dominique Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
18:32:50 +0200:
> I disagree. When searching for a software to do a given job and when I
> have no idea of which software can do it, I begin to look for the ebuild
> descriptions in the portage tre
Le Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:16:27 + (UTC),
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
> 14:39:43 +0200:
>
>
> Indeed. That's why while I don't personally agree with the idea of
> genealogy in theolog
· Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I still fail to see why this is such a big thing if one package which is
> mainly used in relation to a religion is in a herd called theology.
Pardon me, but what makes you say, that gramps is "mainly used in
relation to a religion"? Just because some sect u
Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
14:39:43 +0200:
> I still fail to see why this is such a big thing if one package which is
> mainly used in relation to a religion is in a herd called theology. It's
> not as if the world will come to
Hi,
I would hate to drag this discussion on endlessly, so I promise this
will be my only post :).
Dominique Michel wrote:
> Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:26 -0700,
> Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>
>> Steve Dibb wrote:
>>
>>> Dominique Michel wrote:
>>>
I fully agre
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:26 -0700,
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Steve Dibb wrote:
> > Dominique Michel wrote:
> >
> >> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will
> >> include
> >> both religious and scientific softwares.
> >
> > No worries, app-misc/gram
Steve Dibb wrote:
> Dominique Michel wrote:
>
>> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will
>> include
>> both religious and scientific softwares.
>
> No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is
> herdless once again.
It's interesting that peop
Dominique Michel wrote:
I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will include
both religious and scientific softwares.
No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is herdless
once again.
Steve
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
>>> and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
>>> penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
>>> into the open flame, only cons
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
> > and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
> > penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
> > into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,...
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:59:25 +0200,
Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote:
> > > It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never
> > > answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored.
> >
> > I
>... and if it's more convenient for them in a
> theology herd, why should it be a problem for those not interested in the
> package? It might raise a few eyebrows here or there, but if it's being
> well maintained,
that is the problem, because what is theology? only christianity, only islam?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote:
> > It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never
> > answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored.
>
> I (and I expect others who know) didn't answer this before, as it would
> have been too easy to
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 27
Apr 2007 07:24:18 +0200:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If that's the case, might not "humanities" be a better name?
>>
>> E.g., I don't know what genealogy
16 matches
Mail list logo
