Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-wanted bugcount

2007-11-27 Thread Daniel Drake
Markus Ullmann wrote: K, to sum it up then, everything stays like it is atm. I think that makes sense. Yes, it's unrealistic for us to be able to handle all of them, but I think that's a perfectly reasonable situation. It's common for open source projects to have an excess of feature reques

[gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-wanted bugcount

2007-11-26 Thread Markus Ullmann
K, to sum it up then, everything stays like it is atm. Thanks for your comments :) Greetz -Jokey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-wanted bugcount

2007-11-26 Thread George Shapovalov
Monday, 26. November 2007, Markus Ullmann Ви написали: > Robin H. Johnson schrieb: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote: > > d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status > >board, so that when a developer does want some package not in th

[gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-wanted bugcount

2007-11-26 Thread Markus Ullmann
Robin H. Johnson schrieb: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote: > d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status >board, so that when a developer does want some package not in the >tree, they can search first. That's done already > e)

[gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-wanted bugcount

2007-11-26 Thread Ryan Hill
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status >board, so that when a developer does want some package not in the >tree, they can search first. > e) Encourage existing developers to review and commit this stuff more >often. > > I rea