Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-14 Thread Arsen Arsenović
Mike Gilbert writes: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:25 AM Arsen Arsenović wrote: >> Madhu writes: >> > systemd-udev cannot be built as a static binary again presumably a >> > carefully thought out design decision behind its design and >> > philosophy. >> >> Since static linking is seldom a good

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:25 AM Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Madhu writes: > > systemd-udev cannot be built as a static binary again presumably a > > carefully thought out design decision behind its design and > > philosophy. > > Since static linking is seldom a good idea, it is more likely that > s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-14 Thread Arsen Arsenović
Madhu writes: [...snip...] > One of the planned consequences of this tree-cleaning is the removal > of genkernel, and the use of genkernel to build gentoo's initramfs. > > Genkernel uses eudev for udev, and it works because eudev can be built > statically. > > systemd-udev cannot be built as a st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-13 Thread Alex Boag-Munroe
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 01:20, Madhu wrote: > > * Rich Freeman > : > Wrote on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:18:51 -0400: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:34 PM orbea wrote: > >> Regardless the disappointment is a valid concern when Gentoo is willing > >> to pull the rug up from under users feet under erron

[gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-13 Thread Madhu
* Rich Freeman : Wrote on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:18:51 -0400: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:34 PM orbea wrote: >> Regardless the disappointment is a valid concern when Gentoo is willing >> to pull the rug up from under users feet under erroneous claims of the >> project being dead. > As a complete o