Duncan wrote:
> 3a) Accompany binaries/object code with complete source-code.
..
> What that means is this: Every time and place gentoo distributes
> binaries, we must make available sources as well.
"accompany" !== "make available"
> If we're giving away install-CDs at a conference, we better
Rich Freeman posted on Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:38:20 -0500 as excerpted:
> That's what I'm getting at. The actual changes themselves aren't a
> derivative work - it is the result of applying them that is.
I can (cautiously) agree with that, tho I'm sure there are those who
would take an opposing po
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> To the extent patches are larger than the rather blurry "trivial" level,
> I believe there's no question that they ARE derivative. In the case of
> literal patches, literally and provably so, due to the context-diff which
> li
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:18:51 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Roy Bamford
> wrote:
>> The GPL obliges us to keep such patches around for three years, iirc.
>> Don't we do that ?
>
> Why? We own the copyright on the patches (to whatever degree that
> the
