[gentoo-dev] Re: gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Duncan
Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:59:44 +0100 as excerpted: > Anyway if you read all that up and only mailed about this, I guess you > found no problem with the rest, right ? Yes, but I already admitted to bikeshedding the easy stuff, so I'd honestly not assign too much review

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:06:30 +0100 as > excerpted: > > It's admittedly a style thing thus pretty much up to the author, purely > bikeshedding in the original sense of the essay's trivial color choi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 18 novembre 2012 à 20:45 +, Duncan a écrit : > Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:06:30 +0100 as > excerpted: > [...] > But as I said up top, that's (mostly, the pattern matching vs string > matching will occasionally bite if you're not on the lookout for it) > tri

[gentoo-dev] Re: gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Duncan
Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:06:30 +0100 as excerpted: It's admittedly a style thing thus pretty much up to the author, purely bikeshedding in the original sense of the essay's trivial color choice, but... > # Even though xz-utils are in @system, they must still be added to