Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:56:11 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 30/10/2012 10:46, Duncan wrote:
>> ... tho I had to remask gnutls-3.1.3 as I experienced some problem
>> (IDR what) with it. But I'm running 3.1.2 without issue.
>> What gnutls-3.1.x are you planning to unmask? Do I
On 30/10/2012 10:46, Duncan wrote:
> ... I've been running gnutls-3.x for some time (at one point it was
> needed for the live-git pan I run), tho I had to remask gnutls-3.1.3 as I
> experienced some problem (IDR what) with it. But I'm running 3.1.2
> without issue.
I've been using gnutls-3 on
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:44:20 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 30/10/2012 00:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> reminder: plan on landing this week. glibc-2.17 is in the process of
>> shaking out upstream.
>
> *shrug* we've got the warning so it's fair for it to land. I recommend
> pe
On 18/08/12 18:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use
1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
[...]
there
