On 14/02/15 19:41, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
If only libav and ffmpeg developers would stop breaking their API on
every release...
Just break it once and for all. It's so sad that I still can't upgrade
from libav-9 because of this.
Feature request: could you stop breaking the API for a couple of
ye
If only libav and ffmpeg developers would stop breaking their API on
every release...
Just break it once and for all. It's so sad that I still can't upgrade
from libav-9 because of this.
Feature request: could you stop breaking the API for a couple of
years? Thanks. If you say that you have to, we
On 09/02/15 10:17, Alexis Ballier wrote:
(nb: you can see that this precise one is mostly fixed already.)
I hope it is completely fixed already =\
lu
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:34:57 +0100
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Sadly the time I can spend doing opensource stuff can be compressed
> from time to time and maybe is nicer develop interesting stuff such
> as useful API and features than write tons of s:CODEC_ID:AV_CODEC_ID:
> over countless packages.
ca
On 08/02/15 17:13, Alexis Ballier wrote:
What we need instead of such endless debate & happy bashing (been
there, done that) is people doing the work. That's what will improve
the distribution. I thought letting libav be the default would improve
that;
If nobody helps fixing the orphaned and ne
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:19:18 +
Ian Whyman wrote:
> On 8 February 2015 at 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld
> wrote:
> > The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo
> > users, as well as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very
> > relevant upstream author.
>
> I don't think
El dom, 08-02-2015 a las 12:19 +, Ian Whyman escribió:
[...]
> So long as libav is effectively dictating the API then by defaulting
> to ffmpeg we are just delaying the inevitable breakage htting the
> tree. I know there are people who think we shouldn't break unstable,
> but I personally prefe
On 8 February 2015 at 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo users, as well
> as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very relevant upstream
> author.
I don't think a forum poll, or a poll of users for that matter is
great way to bu
The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo users, as
well as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very relevant upstream
author.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
On 07/02/15 05:16, Ben de Groot wrote:
> I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC.
Ok, that wasn't clear from the commit message.
> Do you think a news item to explain this situation and giving
> explicit instructions for users w
On 7 February 2015 at 10:08, Mike Auty wrote:
> [...] I
> was concerned that a warning which had been in place in package.mask
> since September was removed by a different developer than the one who
> put it in place,
I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC.
> and that a package w
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:57:35 +0100 as
excerpted:
> I tried to choose the options' wording carefully, in order to get as
> much information as possible from a single poll.
Thanks for your wisdom in wording (which, contrary to some others, I
agreed with, because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
On 06/02/15 08:48, Duncan wrote:
> Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as
> excerpted:
>
>> As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is
>> important to open communities like Gentoo's, and reading the
>> discu
Daniel Campbell posted on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:55:05 -0800 as excerpted:
> On 02/04/2015 04:43 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
>> It's fine to have disagreements, but airing them in front of the users
>> like this is not an ideal situation...
>
> As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is impo
14 matches
Mail list logo