Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-11 Thread Michał Górny
On wto, 2017-04-11 at 12:47 -0500, James Potts wrote: > As another user, I have an interesting thought: Keep *_TARGETS and > *_COMPAT, but add useflags called "[python|php|ruby]-compat-testing", > which is at least use.stable.mask'ed (possibly straight-up > use.mask'ed), to any ebuild that uses *_

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-11 Thread James Potts
As another user, I have an interesting thought: Keep *_TARGETS and *_COMPAT, but add useflags called "[python|php|ruby]-compat-testing", which is at least use.stable.mask'ed (possibly straight-up use.mask'ed), to any ebuild that uses *_COMPAT. Setting the appropriate useflag would allow such ebui

[gentoo-dev] Re: Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-10 Thread Duncan
William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:58:57 -0400 as excerpted: > When did changing targets to only have 1 version of Ruby, or 2 pythons > becoming hacking. I do like how it was phrased. It shows right there the > issue. If ANYONE has to hack around it, it sucks > >> Well, you