On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:39:47 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
If you want a list of *that*, look at 134852. But we were discussing
Jakub's contributions, not Jakub's bad behaviour.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
I seem to miss a mail or two here, so the reply is not at the exact
starting point of this subthread.
As already pointed out by Mike, Alec, Ferris and probably others, this
thread has degraded far enough and is off topic here. If you still
want to discuss it, do it in a civil way and in the right p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167285#c11
>
> Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160328
>
> Show me name calling and/or insulting behav
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167285#c11
Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160328
Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96893#c12
Back when we were ask
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200
"Ioannis Aslanidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's
> > effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys,
> > and it's not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate, which
> > kept a
Dan Meltzer wrote:
>> >
>> Man first you devs think it's your god-given right to behave nastily to
>> any usr, then you get all sensitive about Jakub on bugzilla. That is
>> lame, imo. Maybe there should be something about requiring a thick skin
>> to be a dev, since you so clearly require it of us
