[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-08-08 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:08:57 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:13:49 -0400 NP-Hardass wrote: > > This is the first draft of a news item describing a packaging change for > > OpenAFS so that we no longer require the DEBUG_RODATA be turned off. > > This is a second try w

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-08-01 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:13:49 -0400 NP-Hardass wrote: > This is the first draft of a news item describing a packaging change for > OpenAFS so that we no longer require the DEBUG_RODATA be turned off. This is a second try with rewording of the first paragraph, since it was suggested that it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-07-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:05:23 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > I agree with you, but REPLACING_VERSIONS has nothing to do with > such recovery. Yes, it does. Specifically, what we want is for developers to get into the habit of writing safe, clean code, even if they think they don't need to care ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-07-24 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 03:00:40 + (UTC) Duncan wrote: > Andrew Savchenko posted on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:30:39 +0300 as excerpted: > > > Do we ever had such case like multiple versions of the same > > single-slotted package installed or recorded as installed in the real > > world? I'm not sure

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-07-23 Thread Duncan
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200 as excerpted: > 1) If a package only ever had one slot, it cannot ever have two versions > installed at the same time. That guarantee (of only ever one slot) can > be given for the portage tree (sic). Obviously it doesn't work for > over

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-07-23 Thread Duncan
Andrew Savchenko posted on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:30:39 +0300 as excerpted: > Do we ever had such case like multiple versions of the same > single-slotted package installed or recorded as installed in the real > world? I'm not sure even in this, but I may assume that it may happen > one day. > > Do

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: OpenAFS no longer needs kernel option DEBUG_RODATA

2016-07-20 Thread Jonathan Callen
On 07/21/2016 01:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:22:36 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:12:01 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: Display-If-Installed: <=net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2 ...