On 21/08/13 12:23 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> Imho the situation is that agos intensive work displaced all the other
>> ones, or they at least rely on ago doing the work and loose focus.
>>
> At one point before Ago came along, stabilisation of Qt was taking so
> long we had to start masking rev
On 22/08/2013 01:32, Matt Turner wrote:
I want some level between "stable and completely supported" and "loses
all its stable keywords.", at least for alpha.
Is switching their profiles to dev the way to do that?
What would you feel about instead of dropping stable completely,
re-evaluating whi
On 22/08/2013 01:56, Michael Weber wrote:
On 08/21/2013 01:04 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
The manpower on these arches is below acceptable levels and they often
block stabilizations
for many months. This also causes troubles to developers trying to get
rid of old versions of
packages.
I am CC'in
On 21/08/2013 21:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords
- s390
- sh
- ia64
- alpha
- m68k
- sparc
+1
