On 2/8/2005 16:30:45, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
> > best be expedited (read below for why).
>
> Well, I kind of mentioned it on irc, but I'll th
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
best be expedited (read below for why).
Well, I kind of mentioned it on irc, but I'll throw it out here too.
I think the name "proto" is pretty vague and would prefer
to see header
