On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:18:52 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200
> Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600
> > Ryan Hill wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also going to rename the "test" flag to "regression-test" or
> > > something similar to get it out of FE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2013 09:18 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200
> Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>
>>> I'm also going to rename the "test" flag to "regression-test" or
>>> something
On 2 May 2013 16:21, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 May 2013 21:24:07 Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> please do not top post
> -mike
>
My apologies, Gmail has forced upon us this new message composer, and it
sucks, it actively discourages bottom posting, and I'm stuck with it.
I even complain
On Wednesday 01 May 2013 21:24:07 Kent Fredric wrote:
please do not top post
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2 other classes of tests you may want to consider :
- network/internet accessibility required tests
- markers for tests that are known/expected to fail under many conditions
and are not worth end-user-testing, but end-users can force-running any way
if they really want to see the individual failur
On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > I'm also going to rename the "test" flag to "regression-test" or
> > something similar to get it out of FEATURES="test" control. The
> > testsuite is a huge time-suck and onl
