[gentoo-dev] Re: Guidelines for dangerous USE flags

2017-08-29 Thread Duncan
Kent Fredric posted on Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:21:09 +1200 as excerpted: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:06:13 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> nrpe-command-args-SECURITY-HOLE or just nrpe-GAPING-SECURITY-HOLE > > That's probably excessive, if you set that USE flag globally, you > de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Guidelines for dangerous USE flags

2017-08-29 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:06:13 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > nrpe-command-args-SECURITY-HOLE > or just > nrpe-GAPING-SECURITY-HOLE That's probably excessive, if you set that USE flag globally, you deserve what you get. And if you are responsible and you know what you're gettin

[gentoo-dev] Re: Guidelines for dangerous USE flags

2017-08-23 Thread Duncan
Sven Vermeulen posted on Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:37:51 + as excerpted: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:22:51PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> The net-analyzer/nrpe package has a ./configure flag: >> >> --enable-command-args allows clients to specify command arguments. >>