Matthew Gaule posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:55:13 +:
> Could a simple USE flag (Such as "branding") be implemented, which if set,
> will pull in and configure gentoo themes when a package is compiled? This
> could be unset by default, meaning most users
It could be set as a default use flag and those not wanting any
branding can add '-branding' to their make.conf
Regards,
On 4/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Gaule wrote:
> > Could a simple USE flag (Such as "branding") be implemented, which if set,
> > will
> > pull
Matthew Gaule wrote:
Could a simple USE flag (Such as "branding") be implemented, which if set, will
pull in and configure gentoo themes when a package is compiled? This could be
unset by default, meaning most users would not be effected by this.]
If most users are unaffected by the change, th
Could a simple USE flag (Such as "branding") be implemented, which if set, will
pull in and configure gentoo themes when a package is compiled? This could be
unset by default, meaning most users would not be effected by this.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>>
>>> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
>>> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
>>> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that
Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
>> wwwredesign.gentoo.org already has been converted and is going live on
>> www.gentoo.org shortly (we just have a few last minute things to do).
>
> can we add a robots.txt on wwwredesign.gentoo.org that disallows / from
> * ? if the site is just for testing a new lay
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 11:41, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> >>In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> >>drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> >>kept was the flyi
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>
>>In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
>>drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
>>kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
>>use
wwwredesign.gentoo.org already has been converted and is going live on
www.gentoo.org shortly (we just have a few last minute things to do).
can we add a robots.txt on wwwredesign.gentoo.org that disallows /
from * ? if the site is just for testing a new layout or code, we do
not want (any m
On Monday 10 April 2006 20:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> >>>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 14:08, Curtis Napier wrote:
>> I honestly think we can make it happen if we all pitch in.
>
> a simple news item on the front page + GWN request could prob gather a lot of
> attention
>
>> other WM's/desktops can also be done if someone is willing
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Crete wrote:
>>i'll miss him :(
>
>
> Yea we have to keep him, he is one of the most important members of our
> community.
Agreed! I like the lil' alien. (In some obscure way, he reminds me of Earthbound
. . .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, 2006-10-04 at 18:25 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> > drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> > kept was the flying saucer guy. I be
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> >> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> >> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> >> kept was the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
>> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
>> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
>> us
On Monday 10 April 2006 14:08, Curtis Napier wrote:
> I honestly think we can make it happen if we all pitch in.
a simple news item on the front page + GWN request could prob gather a lot of
attention
> other WM's/desktops can also be done if someone is willing to do it.
> Like E17 or XFCE, etc.
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead, I'm now the "Web Coordinator". I proposed this new role to
> the Infra Leads and met no resistance or objections so I have taken
> the initiative and created the role. Also, neysx and I together were
> approache
Vapier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 05:25:23PM CDT]
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> > drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> > kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe tha
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
> use it while we got the redesi
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
>> The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
>> things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
>> (after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
>>
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
> The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
> things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
> (after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
> klieber a little and after
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:08 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Wolf31o2, what about you and the other CD maintainers, are you guys
> willing to use this if we can get it done?
CD creation has nothing to do with it, really. We simply make stuff
based on the defaults. If there were a "branding" USE fla
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote:
>>> Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
>>> easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
>>> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
>>> them could easily be rework
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:53, Curtis Napier wrote:
> We also have the
> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
> them could easily be reworked into something we can use if we need to.
I suggest you to not consider the gentoo icon set. As it is is a _really_ bad
cop
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
>> I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
>
> Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
>
> Thanks,
> g2boojum
Well, I was planning on announcing this later on but I guess now is as
Curtis Napier wrote:
> I think we should have a unified Gentoo Theme that cuts across all
> projects. I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match and I'm also
> willing to help out with theming other things or actually creating the
> artwork if we really need help on that front (I'm not an artist bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Napier wrote:
> Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
> easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
> them could ea
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
> I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
>> Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
>>
>>> How do you want not to enforce it?
>> Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
>>
>> "Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs a
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
>
> > How do you want not to enforce it?
> Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
>
> "Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and installations"
>
> I supp
> Having a Gentoo theme here helps to associate the
> theme with the distribution. Nobody forced me to do this. I just like it :)
In his blog (http://www.livingwithpenguins.blogspot.com/), Steven O.
writes in the "Fresh WORKING install of Gentoo":
> One of the coolest things about the Fluxbox gui
Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
> How do you want not to enforce it?
Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
"Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and installations"
I suppose that the themes would be defaulted to on the LiveCDs and optional
for regu
Simon Stelling posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:28:46 +0200:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>> On Friday 07 April 2006 04:26, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> I also share the opinion that we shouldn't go against upstream wishes
>>> IRT branding, but if upstream encourages s
34 matches
Mail list logo
