Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags

2011-10-02 Thread James Broadhead
On 2 October 2011 03:57, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:19:26 +0300 > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> >    17   tools >> >     9   utils >> >> tools, and utils, what's the difference? perhaps pick one and unify them >> into global USE flag > > Saying what?  "Install optional tools or utili

[gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags

2011-10-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:19:26 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > >17 tools > > 9 utils > > tools, and utils, what's the difference? perhaps pick one and unify them > into global USE flag Saying what? "Install optional tools or utilities." That's pretty useless as far as descriptions go

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags

2011-09-27 Thread James Broadhead
On 27 September 2011 10:33, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Ulrich Mueller posted on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:37:38 +0200 as excerpted: > >>    29   webkit > > I've run into problems with this one, and think it should be split.  At > minimum, there's qt-webkit and webkit-gtk.  As a kde user I wan

[gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags

2011-09-27 Thread Duncan
Ulrich Mueller posted on Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:37:38 +0200 as excerpted: >29 webkit I've run into problems with this one, and think it should be split. At minimum, there's qt-webkit and webkit-gtk. As a kde user I want qt-webkit but for instance, the gimp pulls in webkit-gtk if USE=webkit

[gentoo-dev] Re: Candidates for global USE flags

2011-09-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 27/09/2011 alle 11.19 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: > > invalid logic and useless flag, should be USE "ssl" > this has been discussed so many times it's getting old seeing people > still adding this :-/ There are valid cases in where you either add support for OpenSSL engines