On 08/01/2014 05:35, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
>>
>> Indeed! The thing was that a lot of the packages were keyworded and
>> marked stable back in the day where the arch was more popular.
>>
>> But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
Raúl Porcel posted on Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:52:21 +0200 as excerpted:
> But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
> popular:
>
> alpha: no new hardware in more than 8+ years
> hppa: being phased out IIRC, and no new workstations
> (ie, graphics/sound) in 5+ years
> ia64:
On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
> On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
>>> remove themselves from it and say so?
>>>
>>> Also, if an arch team does that, does that
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
>> remove themselves from it and say so?
>>
>> Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
>> stable requests
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
> remove themselves from it and say so?
>
> Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
> stable requests for that arch on future versions of the package?
On 07/27/2014 02:20 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
> this that I want to ask about.
>
> When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
> architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
> marked
