Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week

2006-10-20 Thread Daniel Drake
Mike Pagano wrote: This seems to me like a good opportunity to engage the arch teams for some assistance. So the arch teams would be happy to handle "package foo doesn't compile with 2.6.18" bugs, for example, bug 148381? Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week

2006-10-20 Thread Mike Pagano
On 10/20/06, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Announce it here (or -core) which needs a fix and then just commit the > fix if it is trivial and there has been no reaction. I think you didn't grasp the problem exactly. There are a large number of packages wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week

2006-10-20 Thread Daniel Drake
Christian Faulhammer wrote: Announce it here (or -core) which needs a fix and then just commit the fix if it is trivial and there has been no reaction. I think you didn't grasp the problem exactly. There are a large number of packages which build against the kernel and do not get much atten

[gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week

2006-10-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Tach Daniel, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Daniel Drake schrieb: > This is becoming a real problem for me as I'm having to waste excessive > amounts of time on every kernel release fixing bugs in packages which > are nothing to do with me. I'm considering dropping stable