Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:49:10 +0200:
> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
>> What's so hard about paying attention when replying?
>
> What's so hard about making the behaviour consistent?
What's so hard about configuring your clien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
>> It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
>> is not necessarily the function of the "Reply" button. In mutt, and IIRC
>> in Thunderbird as well, "reply" is intended to mean "r
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:45:54PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > > > > Please, try to stay on the right mailing l
Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > > > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very
> > > > annoying when you don't...
> > >
> > > No matt
Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
is not necessarily the function of the "Reply" button. In mutt, and IIRC
in Thunderbird as well, "reply" is intended to mean "reply to author",
and there is a separate "reply to list
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> > It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
> > is not necessarily the function of the "Reply" button. In mutt, and IIRC
> > in Thunderbird as well, "reply" is intended to mean "rep
What, you're saying you're not subscribed to any non-Gentoo lists?
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:49:10 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > What's so hard about paying attention when replying?
|
| What's so hard about making the behaviour consistent?
--
Ciaran Mc
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
> is not necessarily the function of the "Reply" button. In mutt, and IIRC
> in Thunderbird as well, "reply" is intended to mean "reply to author",
> and there is a separate "reply to list" function w
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> What's so hard about paying attention when replying?
What's so hard about making the behaviour consistent?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerpri
What's so hard about paying attention when replying? Surely you spend
enough time thinking about your reply that an extra second to hit the
right button is irrelevant...
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:27:16 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Georgi Georgiev napsal(a):
| > This is not an argument
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:10:57PM +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
> Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
> > > the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
> >
> > Thi
Georgi Georgiev napsal(a):
> This is not an argument. Here are some real arguments ;)
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I don't give a damn, make the behaviour consistent across all Gentoo
mailing lists. (And in the unfortunate case you pick up the -core
behaviour by chance, I guara
maillog: 16/10/2006-18:31:32(+0200): Jakub Moc types
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
>
> The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
This is not an argument. Here are some real arguments ;)
http:
This thread is weird, here's a picture of a giraffe:
http://www.mccullagh.org/db9/10d-1/giraffe-closeup.jpg
enjoy
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer aka:
xx (Scissors Were Here) xx
pgpKkOr9KETz4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
> > the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
>
> This list sets Reply-to to direct replies to the list. gentoo-core
> doesn't. Pe
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying
> > > when you don't...
> >
> > No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour
unsubscribe
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:35:08PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz napsal(a):
> > Jakub Moc wrote:
> >> I don't see what's there to fix, already told that the behaviour is
> >> damned inconsistent with all other mailing lists. Fix the mailing list,
> >> ktnxbye, don't have ti
Or better yet, get the hint that someone was making fun of you for
bitching about someone else's top posting when you replied to the
wrong list.
--Iggy
On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Andrej Kacian napsal(a):
Fix your mail client, and don't lay the b
Donnie Berkholz napsal(a):
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> I don't see what's there to fix, already told that the behaviour is
>> damned inconsistent with all other mailing lists. Fix the mailing list,
>> ktnxbye, don't have time for such nonsense.
>
> Why don't you use Reply All or Reply to List, like ever
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Why don't you use Reply All or Reply to List, like everyone else?
Well, if the mailing list sent a proper Reply-To header in its
messages, we wouldn't really be having this thread, right? :)
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key ID:
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Andrej Kacian napsal(a):
>
>> Fix your mail client, and don't lay the blame on infra. I never did a
>> misplaced
>> reply with mine.
>
> I don't see what's there to fix, already told that the behaviour is
> damned inconsistent with all other mailing lists. Fix the mailing list
Andrej Kacian napsal(a):
> Fix your mail client, and don't lay the blame on infra. I never did a
> misplaced
> reply with mine.
I don't see what's there to fix, already told that the behaviour is
damned inconsistent with all other mailing lists. Fix the mailing list,
ktnxbye, don't have time for
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:31:32 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
>
> The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
> default when you hit Reply, just the _o
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying
> > when you don't...
>
> No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of the
> _one_ mailing just that just _has_ to be special for _no_ appar
Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
default when you hit Reply, just the _one_ needs to be special. It's
been mentioned over and over again, and never been fixe
Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:52:12 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying
> > when you don't...
>
> No matter how hard I try,
Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying when
> you don't...
No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of the
_one_ mailing just that just _has_ to be special for _no_ apparent
reason at all.
Sorry, not my fault, the beha
Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying when
you don't...
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:10:32 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh napsal(a):
> > Err... "clean up after yourself"... and if person to have made the
> > mess is not capable of clea
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh napsal(a):
> Err... "clean up after yourself"... and if person to have made the mess is
> not capable of cleaning up?
Please, don't top-post, it's very annoying...
I guess pretty much everyone is capable of reverting his changes to
original state at least? :P
--
Best
29 matches
Mail list logo
