[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-03 Thread Duncan
Ciaran McCreesh posted on Sun, 02 Sep 2012 20:04:11 +0100 as excerpted: > The big issues you're ignoring: > > * What to do if a package has an SDEPEND upon cat/pkg[x] and the user > has cat/pkg[-x] installed, or if another package in the resolution > depends upon cat/pkg and the user hasn't s

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-03 Thread Duncan
Fabio Erculiani posted on Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:38:26 +0200 as excerpted: > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: >> >> The big issues you're ignoring: > > And you call them "big issues"? > Ah, the "you're ignoring" part looks a bit arrogant, are you short with > arguments ;-) ?

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Duncan
Fabio Erculiani posted on Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:45:12 +0200 as excerpted: > - If SDEPEND contains USE flags, these are written in stone and cannot > be changed without a rebuild. This is generally fine for source > packages, a bit less for binpkgs, but not really a big deal IMO. This being the case