Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin H. Johnson skrev: | On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: |> What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or |> should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there |> is n

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: > What do you think - Should I add this library ebuild to the tree, or > should I just give up getting miniupnpd added to the tree, since there > is no alternative to using libiptc? > I already have an ebuild for it that compil

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Having a seperate package for libiptc

2008-10-24 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, ~From version 1.4.1.1 of iptables, libiptc headers and library is no longer installed. Since some programs still depends on it (net-misc/miniupnpd which will be hitting the tree as soon as this is sorted out, and probably some other programs