Curtis Napier wrote:
> Giving ad space to our sponsors is legal for us to do as a Not For
> Profit because they are donating goods and/or services to us.
> Technically we are not giving them "ads", we are acknowledging the
> donated goods and/or services. Just like PBS does at the beginning of
> it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: MD5
>>
>> I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
>> Anything that helps people eat is OK in my
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: MD5
>
> I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
> Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)
>
> On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)
On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run this past
our lawyer(s) and make sure we have our i's dotted and out
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:00 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
> > this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
> > already have a Support link on
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 00:31 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
> > developers from the folks they help. Doesn't matter how well we make
> > it clear that these folks are "independent"; their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
>>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
>>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ou
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi,
We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
developers from the folks they help. Doesn't matter how well we make
it clear that these folks are "independent"; their actions will
reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complai
Hi,
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
This is a good
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
I was thinking about
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ours, but
>> at least payi
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ours, but
>> at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them.
> Or co
12 matches
Mail list logo
