Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-10 Thread Michael Cummings
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:09 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > ./dev-perl/Event-ExecFlow (dvd::rip dep) > ./dev-perl/AnyEvent(dvd::rip dep) Perl herd will grab these. For that matter, the metadata already points to us... ~mcummings signature.asc Descripti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 08 May 2006 00:47, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > Does the media-video herd^H^H^H^Hgroup automatically inherit this one ? If > not, and if nobody volunteers, I'm willing to salvage it. I have somewhere > an ebuild for kino-0.8.1 that includes an --as-needed fix. Feel free to join media-video tea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On 5/5/06, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be >> absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On 5/5/06, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be > absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the > teams maintaining those herds, others might face

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexandre Buisse wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2006 at 10:02:10 +0200, Daniel Goller wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be >> absorbed into their herds w/o a d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuan Van wrote: > Daniel Goller wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be >> absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the >> teams maint

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-07 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Mylchreest wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:09:39PM -0500, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Assuming there are no objections I can take over the following. > >> ./app-benchmarks/cpuburn >> ./app-benchmarks/bonnie++ > > Regards

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-06 Thread Tuan Van
Daniel Goller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the teams maintaining those herds, others might face extinction w/o a direct maintainer. ./net

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:09, Daniel Goller wrote: > ./games-emulation/mupen64-riceplugin > ./games-emulation/mupen64-glide64 > ./games-emulation/mupen64-glN64 > ./games-emulation/mupen64-blight-tr64gl > ./games-emulation/mupen64-blight-input > ./games-emulation/mupen64-jttl_sound > ./games-emulat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-05 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Fri, May 5, 2006 at 10:02:10 +0200, Daniel Goller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be > absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the > teams maintaining those herds, others mi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-05 Thread John Mylchreest
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:09:39PM -0500, Daniel Goller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Assuming there are no objections I can take over the following. > ./app-benchmarks/cpuburn > ./app-benchmarks/bonnie++ Regards, John -- Role:Gentoo Linux Kernel Lead Gentoo Linux:http://www.gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-05 Thread spradlim
Thanks thats what I was looking for. On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:42:31AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > On Thu, 4 May 2006 21:20:48 -0500 > spradlim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat > > related to the following email. I k

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-04 Thread Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
On Thu, 4 May 2006 21:20:48 -0500 spradlim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat > related to the following email. I know and understand Linux very > well. I also know how ebuilds work. So how do I go about maintaining > packages and gett

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-04 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 spradlim wrote: > I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat > related to the following email. I know and understand Linux very well. > I also know how ebuilds work. So how do I go about maintaining packages > and getting them

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-04 Thread spradlim
I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat related to the following email. I know and understand Linux very well. I also know how ebuilds work. So how do I go about maintaining packages and getting them into portage. For example I would like to maintain a munin, munin-plu

[gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the teams maintaining those herds, others might face extinction w/o a direct maintainer. ./app-admin/gtkdiskfree ./sc