On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:07:48PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/01/2015 11:04 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> >
> > Please read my statement above again; I said umount not mount. ;-)
>
> Not tested that, but isn't that something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/01/2015 11:04 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Please read my statement above again; I said umount not mount. ;-)
Not tested that, but isn't that something that should be fixed in
busybox? is there an upstream bug for it if it isn't supported?
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:56:55PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01/10/15 04:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:42:15PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius
> > wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/10/15 04:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:42:15PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Since this conversation is now technical rather than news-item
>> related, I'v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/01/2015 10:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> On busybox, the last time I checked, umount -a doesn't support -O
> at all.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468600 seems to indicate it
does, see comment 1: "It seems busybox-1.21.0 mount ha
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:42:15PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Since this conversation is now technical rather than news-item
>> related, I've changed to a new thread.
>>
>> On 01/
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:42:15PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Since this conversation is now technical rather than news-item
> related, I've changed to a new thread.
>
> On 01/10/15 02:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 1 October 2015 17:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since this conversation is now technical rather than news-item
related, I've changed to a new thread.
On 01/10/15 02:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert
> wrote:
On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wr