Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: was Re: bash-3.1 stable

2013-04-15 Thread Peter Stuge
Jeroen, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:51:28 -0700 "Gregory M. Turner" wrote: > > > Open source seems to arrive at consensus by means of a process > > something like: > > > > whiny trolling -> > > Could you please take the obvious trolling elsewhere Consider that it wasn't t

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: was Re: bash-3.1 stable

2013-04-15 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:51:28 -0700 "Gregory M. Turner" wrote: > Open source seems to arrive at consensus by means of a process > something like: > > whiny trolling -> Could you please take the obvious trolling elsewhere, thanks? Hint: if you think you need to put "OT:" in the Subject line, yo

[gentoo-dev] OT: was Re: bash-3.1 stable

2013-04-14 Thread Gregory M. Turner
On 4/2/2013 10:54 AM, Duncan wrote: Tho in practice, if you're here long you do develop a rather thick hide. Nothing NEAR what it was a few years ago, tho. Before it gets anywhere near that, there's warnings, these days. Kinda just what happens, when you put a bunch of unpaid, sleep-deprived,