Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos Maintainence

2008-02-13 Thread Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Hi Paul, On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > > On Monday 10 December 2007 15:41:47 Doug Klima wrote: [snip] > One of my staff members is currently being mentored to become a developer, > he is going to offer to maintain MI

Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos Maintainence

2008-02-12 Thread Paul B. Henson
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > On Monday 10 December 2007 15:41:47 Doug Klima wrote: > [snip] > > > Short version, we need a Heimdal and MIT-KRB5 maintainer. Preferably 2 > > since Heimdal and MIT are different. > Did we get any maintainers for these packages? metadata/her

Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos Maintainence

2008-02-12 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen pisze: On Monday 10 December 2007 15:41:47 Doug Klima wrote: [snip] Short version, we need a Heimdal and MIT-KRB5 maintainer. Preferably 2 since Heimdal and MIT are different. Did we get any maintainers for these packages? metadata/herds is still empty. If we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos Maintainence

2008-02-12 Thread Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
On Monday 10 December 2007 15:41:47 Doug Klima wrote: [snip] > Short version, we need a Heimdal and MIT-KRB5 maintainer. Preferably 2 > since Heimdal and MIT are different. Did we get any maintainers for these packages? metadata/herds is still empty. If we don't get any maintainers I think we sho

[gentoo-dev] Kerberos Maintainence

2007-12-10 Thread Doug Klima
Hello all, Currently our Heimdal packages and MIT-KRB5 packages are woefully out of date. I know Seemant tried for a while and I have been trying to recruit maintainers for these packages but completely unsuccessfully. So I turn to the mailing list to hopefully recruit someone. I don't use Heimdal