Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-03 Thread Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Thomas Anderson wrote: > In general, the quiz is supposed to test and educate recruits about Gentoo > development practices. But if all parts of a question are asked in questions > like that(where it's obvious that 'no' isn't a valid answer) it's just going > to > result in more googling rather th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-03 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 11:09:16PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri R??ty wrote: > >> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz. > >>> > >> Ebuild quiz: > >> > >> 19. What is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-03 Thread Michael Hammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I really appreciate your work on that! g, mueli - -- - Michael Hammer| | Graz, AT Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-02 Thread Thilo Bangert
Samuli Suominen said: > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end > >>> quiz. > >> > >> Ebuild quiz: > >> > >> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz. >>> >> Ebuild quiz: >> >> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree? >> > > Looking back, my answe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz. >> > > Ebuild quiz: > > 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree? > Looking back, my answer to that question was insufficient

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Petteri Räty
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs >> like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a >> package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matchin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs > like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a > package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching > entries and remove them t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-07-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Samuli Suominen wrote: I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching entries and remove them too. Anyhow, package.mask's and package

[gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-07-31 Thread Samuli Suominen
I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching entries and remove them too. Anyhow, package.mask's and package.use.mask's should all be