On Sunday 08 May 2005 04:30 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility;
> > Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable,
> > seeing as it's not a bug in KDE...
On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
> adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing
> as it's not a bug in KDE...
Wrong, it's a KDE bug.
To be exact is KDE bug #101542.
The problem is t
On 5/8/05, Luke-Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff.
>
> Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
> adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE
On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff.
Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo
adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as
it's not a bug in
On Sunday 08 May 2005 19:05, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I
> don't use "kasteroids" so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue.
With gcc 3.3 you should be safe (as long as -fvisibility=hidden patch wasn't
ported to it).
Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I
don't use "kasteroids" so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue.
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote:
>
>
>> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves
On Monday 09 May 2005 01:16, LostSon wrote:
> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into
> the stable tree realtively quickly. Have there been that many bugs and
> problems that it is slowing it down? I have been using it since it hit
> portage and have not had any prob
On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote:
> Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into
> the stable tree realtively quickly.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86898
The explanation is quite long, just look at that bug's comments and you'll
find why kde 3.4 can
Hey All
Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into the
stable tree realtively quickly. Have there been that many bugs and problems
that it is slowing it down? I have been using it since it hit portage and
have not had any problems. So i am just curious this is in no
