On 08/31/2010 11:03 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> How about this as an idea:
> 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD",
> "Returning:Unknown")
> 2. Automated emails when:
> 2.1. It's after the return date (weekly).
> 2.2. You start committing again.
Sounds good:
https:
On 31-08-2010 10:03, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
>> Hello fellow developers.
>>
>> On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having
>>> something the other way around; i.e
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 04:03:21 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'll fully admit that I neglected to remove my last .away until I
> double-checked earlier today.
apparently i'd left mine too since OLS
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 8/31/10, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:03:21AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>
>> How about this as an idea:
>> 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD",
>> "Returning:Unknown")
>> 2. Automated emails when:
>> 2.1. It's after the return date (
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:03:21AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> How about this as an idea:
> 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD",
> "Returning:Unknown")
> 2. Automated emails when:
> 2.1. It's after the return date (weekly).
Ok but what about the Returning:Un
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
> Hello fellow developers.
>
> On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having
> > something the other way around; i.e. monitoring for activity in
> > commits, bugzill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
On 30-08-2010 16:36, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi there
>>
>> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
>> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3
Hello fellow developers.
On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having
> something the other way around; i.e. monitoring for activity in
> commits, bugzilla, IRC and maybe the -dev mailing list to see if
> people are still active
On 08/30/10 08:20, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 16:14, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
>> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
>> This
>> either means that these devs are inact
On Monday, August 30, 2010 10:14:48 Markos Chandras wrote:
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they
> came back and jus
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 07:36:29PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> > system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> > This
> > eith
On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hi there
>
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This
> either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
> an
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 16:14, Markos Chandras wrote:
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This
> either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
> and just
Hi there
It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old. This
either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
and just didn't bother updating their status. Is it possible for
14 matches
Mail list logo
