Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
How many people have both vim and nano installed?
Or xine and mplayer?
well, i wouldn't say nano is doing the same as vi. There's a pretty big
difference. Also, those people who have both installed probably don't use both,
they just installed vi and didn't car
On Friday 14 October 2005 00:33, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> I already tried preparing a list, but right now, they are probably limited
> to tar and mpg123/mpg321 ... sort of.
Add sys-apps/star to your list.
> * don't install the symlink in src_install
> * in pkg_postinst, look at ${ROOT}/
On Friday 14 October 2005 10:17, Simon Stelling wrote:
> What would we gain with such a change? You have two tools installed that
> are nearly equal, so why would one want to have two of them?
Testing, for once.
How many people have both vim and nano installed?
Or xine and mplayer?
I don't see muc
What would we gain with such a change? You have two tools installed that are
nearly equal, so why would one want to have two of them?
*me scratching head*
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi everybody,
Please don't start flaming me for this proposal, it's a discussion.
Now, we have in tree app-arch/bsdtar and app-arch/tar (gnu tar) that are
syntax compatible and can actually work fine on Gentoo/Linux or
Gentoo/FreeBSD or anything Gentoo/*..
Now they are probably the only two of
