On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:52 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I was referring to all of profiles/ in general.
>
> It came to me because antarus was looking for vapier to see why
> profiles/lang.desc existed.
>
> I'm thinking that keeping track of the very top level stuff like
> thirdpartymirrors,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>>> Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
>>> architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
be putting your changes in the ChangeLog.
Just wondering, any object
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:43:31PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote:
> No objections. TBH we don't really have to edit those profiles often.
> We/I try to keep them as static as possible. When they do change it's
> usually cuz somebody has some brilliant idea for some non linux which
> forces all other pro
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 00:43, Ned Ludd wrote:
> We/I try to keep them as static as possible. When they do change it's
> usually cuz somebody has some brilliant idea for some non linux which
> forces all other profiles to update to mask or unmask some use flag.
Actually lately I've just cleaned
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
> > > architecture level. If you make
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Just wondering, any objections if we add ChangeLogs at the rest of the
> > levels in profiles? Would esp. be useful for some of the more global
> > changes.
>
> Not really.
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
> > architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
> > be putting your changes
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
> architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
> be putting your changes in the ChangeLog.
Just wondering, any objections if we add ChangeL
Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
be putting your changes in the ChangeLog.
For example, if you edit
profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1/no-multilib/package.mask, then you
need to add an entry at
10 matches
Mail list logo
