On Monday 07 November 2005 22:56, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Ok, this is a change to the GLEP process, so it itself needs to be a
> GLEP... All it does is propose that GLEPs be allowed to stick example
> code in a subdirectory rather than having to inline things or shove
> them off on someone's devsp
Okay, it works according to my useless opinion :)
On 11/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:34:44 -0500 Dan Meltzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I suppose my only question is, why can't examples be inlined at the
> | bottom of the glep, and simply use a in
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:34:44 -0500 Dan Meltzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I suppose my only question is, why can't examples be inlined at the
| bottom of the glep, and simply use a in document link to reference
| them?
They can be, it's just really frickin' messy. It also makes it slightly
harder
I suppose my only question is, why can't examples be inlined at the
bottom of the glep, and simply use a in document link to reference
them?
On 11/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, this is a change to the GLEP process, so it itself needs to be a
> GLEP... All it does is propos
Ok, this is a change to the GLEP process, so it itself needs to be a
GLEP... All it does is propose that GLEPs be allowed to stick example
code in a subdirectory rather than having to inline things or shove
them off on someone's devspace.
Text version attached. An HTML version will be up on the ma
