Il 07/01/2013 17:13, Richard Yao ha scritto:
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
issues please let us know.
We probably should not sta
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
>
>
>
We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is
Ryan Hill schrieb:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are
> hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if
> anyone knows of any issues please let us know.
There is still one blocker to bug 346809 which may cause headaches for
arm users.
[4.6/ICE] i
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
+1. I know I've been clicking around those bug trees a few tim
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
issues please let us know.
I was actually thinking of poking you about this. I've been using 4.6
o
This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
issues please let us know.
--
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgetslearn a language baby, it's that kind of place
@ gentoo.org
