Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty mail aliases WAS: Packages of for grabs

2007-09-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:20:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > gaim-bugs (B, 285 closed assigned, 19 closed cc) > that's because gaim is dead and it's be re-appropriated to net-im ... if you > want, change the bugs db so that all those bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty mail aliases WAS: Packages of for grabs

2007-09-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 17 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > gaim-bugs (B, 285 closed assigned, 19 closed cc) that's because gaim is dead and it's be re-appropriated to net-im ... if you want, change the bugs db so that all those bugs get reassigned to net-im (doing a mass-reassignment via bugzilla wi

[gentoo-dev] Empty mail aliases WAS: Packages of for grabs

2007-09-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
I saw the following in Christian's email, and I thought that was odd, having never heard of the benchmarks aliases before: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Christian Heim wrote: > benchmarks: > - app-benchmarks/bonnie++ (johnm) > - app-benchmarks/cpuburn (johnm) I checked on the aliase