On 08/19/2016 03:49 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
with gold
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 06:58:44 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they
> > > build with gold it completely
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
>> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> > If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
>> > with gold it completely achieves th
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
> > with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result
> > in fewer bugs using the
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 18.08.2016 kell 23:56, kirjutas Alexis Ballier:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:41 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> > On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> > > Rich Freeman wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you just check your packa
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:41 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they
> >> build with gold it completely achieves the goa
On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
>> with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result
>> in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
> with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result
> in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well.
That's what a tinderbox is for. The only QA
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>
> And as long as I keep reading such statements I won't use ld.gold
> anywhere on my (dev-)systems. A linker IMHO is a far too crucial
> toolchain component to blindly play around with.
>
There really isn't any need to use it as a daily drive
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> Is it as simple as switching the linker and re-merging packages that one
> maintains? Is gold supposed to be a big deal? Does it do the job of
> linking better? I read the blog post and all but nobody's explaining
> what gold does better
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:43:42 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:37:42 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
>[...]
>> That said, I'd really like for Gentoo to be able to finally switch to
>> ld.gold by default.
>
>It still has problems with kernel or kernel modules here and there.
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:37:42 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
> That said, I'd really like for Gentoo to be able to finally switch to
> ld.gold by default.
It still has problems with kernel or kernel modules here and there.
Also from my experience gold demands more memory on linking large
bin
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:39:37 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Is it as simple as switching the linker and re-merging packages that
> one maintains? Is gold supposed to be a big deal? Does it do the job
> of linking better? I read the blog post and all but nobody's
> explaining what gold does better
On 08/17/2016 01:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, fellow developers.
>
> TL;DR: switch to the darn gold linker, and start fixing your darn
> packages!
>
> After many years, the underlinking tracker [1] is still full of bugs.
> This is a huge QA problem, and most of the developers don't test fo
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> $ sudo binutils-config --linker ld.gold
"sudo", really? Are we Ubuntu now? :)
$ sudo binutils-config --linker ld.gold
bash: sudo: command not found
Ulrich
pgpUpWKGw1EbA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello, fellow developers.
TL;DR: switch to the darn gold linker, and start fixing your darn
packages!
After many years, the underlinking tracker [1] is still full of bugs.
This is a huge QA problem, and most of the developers don't test for
it.
Long story short, the thing usually looks like this
16 matches
Mail list logo
