On Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see
> the potential for danger.
>
> To date, for an init script that has baselayout2-specific behavior, we
> have had some variant of [ -e /lib/librc.so ] in the init script.
>
В Пнд, 19/01/2009 в 17:18 +0100, Santiago M. Mola пишет:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Friedrich Oslage
> wrote:
> > Why not teach /sbin/runscript it's own version? With something like this
> > we could also do stuff depending on a specific version of openrc:
>
> That would be a good solu
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Friedrich Oslage wrote:
>
> Why not teach /sbin/runscript it's own version? With something like this
> we could also do stuff depending on a specific version of openrc:
>
That would be a good solution since it'll allow us to check higher
versions for new feature
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:11:52PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:07 Sat 17 Jan , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
> > like /etc/baselayout2? The file must reside on the / partition even when
> > the major trees /usr, /v
On 15:07 Sat 17 Jan , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
> like /etc/baselayout2? The file must reside on the / partition even when
> the major trees /usr, /var, /tmp, /opt, /boot, /home, /dev, /root are
> separate mountpoints.
Ho
В Вск, 18/01/2009 в 00:52 +0100, Friedrich Oslage пишет:
> Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> > I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see
> > the potential for danger.
> > As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
> > like /etc/baselayout2?
Wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see
> the potential for danger.
>
> To date, for an init script that has baselayout2-specific behavior, we
> have had some variant of [ -e /lib/librc.so ] i
I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see
the potential for danger.
To date, for an init script that has baselayout2-specific behavior, we
have had some variant of [ -e /lib/librc.so ] in the init script.
On a multilib profile with no symlinks and a 64-bit userspace,
