On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> Once sys-power/speedfreq is masked (well, if it gets masked), the power
> management guide at
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/power-management-guide.xml#doc_chap3 should
> probably be updated to remove sys-power/speedfreq from the text, or
On Monday 25 April 2005 07:30 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> > On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in
> > > more than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>>Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
>>>
If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
app
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> >>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
> >>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
> >>updates/2Q-2005?
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:09 -0400, Greg Hasseler wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
> > than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
> > (which,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>
>>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
>>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
>>updates/2Q-2005?
>>
>>
>
>Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
> append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
> updates/2Q-2005?
Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECT
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
>than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
>(which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
>
>There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in
On Monday 25 April 2005 03:55 pm, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
> than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
> (which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
>
> There are currently 5 o
Hi,
The sys-power/speedfreq package has not seen an upstream release in more
than a year, and it is superseded in every way by sys-power/cpufreqd
(which, in turn, is actively maintained by upstream).
There are currently 5 open bugs about sys-power/speedfreq in Gentoo
bugzilla - most of them indic
10 matches
Mail list logo
