On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 20:24 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 + Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | So the "glue" is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
> > | method. STV suppo
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> (By the way, if the ballots from council2005 are still around, and if
> someone can make them anonymous (convert names to something like C1, C2,
> etc.), I can take them and show what results STV would give, if you'd
> like a controlled test.)
Please see the following -co
On Thursday 10 August 2006 11:57, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> but that's no reason not to start collecting them.
once we've settled, it'd be good to upload the scripts we actually used to the
council voting section
-mike
pgpWoAg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
> log into dev
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 + Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | So the "glue" is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
> | method. STV supports several protocols for selecting some number of
> | winners from a
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 + Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| So the "glue" is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
| method. STV supports several protocols for selecting some number of
| winners from a list of candidates, but Condorcet is not among them,
| because Cond
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:49 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2006 18:51 schrieb Grant Goodyear:
> > Olivier Crete wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 11:42:14AM CDT]
> >
> > > On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > > I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the s
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:00:25PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:42:47 -0700
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is the current "election" name that we should use when running
> > votify?
>
> > > To vote, log into dev.g.o and type "votify --help" for
> > > inst
Greg KH wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:42:47PM CDT]
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> > but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> > open, and will remain so until 00
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:42:47 -0700
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the current "election" name that we should use when running
> votify?
> > To vote, log into dev.g.o and type "votify --help" for
> > instructions.
Doing that explained everything. :)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
gent
Olivier Crete wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 11:42:14AM CDT]
> On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for voting
> software ?
Well, fmccor has suggested STV[1], so the current plan is to use
"countify" to assemble the usual master
On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:42, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> > but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> > open, and will remain so until 00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
>> but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
>> open, and will remain s
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
> log into dev.g.o
Olivier Crete wrote:
> I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for voting
> software ?
We follow two trails : fixing countify or find something else. I'll have
a look at countify, but more monkey eyeballs can't hurt.
We didn't find a good alternative yet, so you can also help in th
Christel Doty wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:34:50PM CDT]
> Sure, just let me know what you need me to do Grant :)
Thanks! Um, I'm not quite sure what's going to be needed just yet,
but I'll keep you informed.
-g2boojum-
PS. With three election officials, we probably have enough now.
--
Grant Go
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
> log into dev.g.o and ty
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
> log into dev.g.o and ty
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into dev.g.o and type "votify --help" for instructions. If you run
into any problem
19 matches
Mail list logo
