Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote: >> - one ChangeLog for each first-level subdir other than categories >> (i.e. eclass, licenses, profiles, etc.), > Already done, just querying if profiles/ needs more ChangeLog detail. Yeah, keep one ChangeLog for all of profiles/. The existing

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
My question was explicitly asking about profiles/, but I'll respond to the other pieces in turn. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:59:57PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I'd say keep it simple: > - one ChangeLog for each package dir, Already done. > - no ChangeLog for category dirs (they contain only a

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-29 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:59:57 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote: > > > TL;DR: Let's replace profiles/**/ChangeLog with profiles/ChangeLog, > >because it's a mess. > > > I'm writing the new changelog generation code [1][2], and I'm > > wond

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote: > TL;DR: Let's replace profiles/**/ChangeLog with profiles/ChangeLog, >because it's a mess. > I'm writing the new changelog generation code [1][2], and I'm > wondering if we can clean up the mess that we have in profiles/. > The existing

[gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
TL;DR: Let's replace profiles/**/ChangeLog with profiles/ChangeLog, because it's a mess. I'm writing the new changelog generation code [1][2], and I'm wondering if we can clean up the mess that we have in profiles/. The existing Portage egencache --update-changelogs command does NOT gener