-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser skrev:
> Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Does this mean that gcc-3.4 will no longer have libstdc++ as a
>>dependency? :-D
>
>
> That is what I hope to accomplish, yes.
>
Okay, you got my vote for this then.
btw. I
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Does this mean that gcc-3.4 will no longer have libstdc++ as a
> dependency? :-D
That is what I hope to accomplish, yes.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
Mark Loeser skrev:
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>>So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
>>>you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
>>>necessary.
>>
>>Well, you can tell I did
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
> > you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
> > necessary.
>
> Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
| Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
|
|>So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate
it if
|>you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
|>necessary.
|
|
| Well, you can tell I d
Mark Loeser wrote:
>Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand,
>since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for
>this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the
>virtual. I'll make one later unless anyone has strong
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if
> you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if
> necessary.
Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand,
since its been brought t
Currently we are forcing people to either have gcc-3.3 installed, or
libstdc++-v3 so that old packages that weren't recompiled yet don't break,
and binary packages that need libstdc++.so.5 don't break horribly as well.
I'd like to see this dependency in the gcc ebuilds go away and all of the
binary
