On 04/08/2013 01:14 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to
PAX_MARKINGS="none",
and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different value.
That makes some sens
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to
> PAX_MARKINGS="none",
> and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different
> value.
That makes some sense to me. The downside is that that swi
On 04/08/2013 12:08 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 04/07/2013 05:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>> wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call
>>> no
>>> longer has a || di
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Mike Gilbert schrieb:
>>> After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call
>>> no
>>> longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
>>> XATTR_PAX, both or neither marking
Mike Gilbert schrieb:
>> After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
>> longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
>> XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kernel configuration,
>> filesystem and mount options.
>>
>> I'd
On 04/07/2013 07:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:08:41 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
I can try to get the user.pax on tmpfs patch into the Linux tree. At
the very least, we can get it into gentoo-sources.
What does this patch do? I haven't been following this discussion;
a
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:08:41 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> I can try to get the user.pax on tmpfs patch into the Linux tree. At
> the very least, we can get it into gentoo-sources.
What does this patch do? I haven't been following this discussion;
also, please CC ker...@gentoo.org when you
On 04/07/2013 05:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
> longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
> XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kerne
Hello All,
After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no
longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX,
XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kernel configuration,
filesystem and mount options.
I'd say that is not a good thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
