Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
> On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> > is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> > assign bugs just because you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:04:31PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The same goes
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The standard user privileges
Come on guys, bug wrangling isn't that difficult just read metadata.xml,
if it's not correct, it's not your fault, if it's you misread it, I dare
to except devs won't get angry at it and just reassign to whoever they
see fit with a proper message.
If you're so afraid to make errors, just reassign
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:52:02 -0500
"Jeremy Olexa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me
> the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
> and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
> by lo
On Monday 30 June 2008, Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080630 19:53]:
> > [...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
>
> s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
> especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
> b-w'ing if
* Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080630 19:53]:
> [...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
b-w'ing if it makes sense and is possible.
g, mueli
--
-
Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me
> the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
> and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
> by looking at metadata.xml. IMO, b-w'ing is
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
> punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
> perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
> you reassi
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign bugs (back) to bug-wranglers@ without properly
communicating the reason you are d
11 matches
Mail list logo
